Carlos Ramos's Discussions (696)

Discussions Replied To (695) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"BUt if Obama would have taken the time to crack open a book while he was instead inh…"

Carlos Ramos replied May 7, 2015 to Rep. Steve King: Obama pushing 'ideology of Karl Marx'

12 May 7, 2015
Reply by Jo Gonzalez

ADMIN

"What?  No it doesnt -- We are not deserving of the crap you are a part of.  Why isnt…"

Carlos Ramos replied May 7, 2015 to O'Reilly Slams Hillary Over Clinton Foundation: 'This Country Is Doomed' If 'Presidency Can Be Bought'

34 May 16, 2015
Reply by M-AR-15-5.56X45!

"Here are two men whose lives do not matter.  Sorry with all the grief these two have…"

Carlos Ramos replied May 4, 2015 to Brutal Honesty: This Is The Video About Racism They Don’t Want You To See

15 May 5, 2015
Reply by PatriotGal

"A huge divide, breeds not only mistrust but favoritism and dual standards. You are c…"

Carlos Ramos replied Apr 30, 2015 to None of This Will Ever End Until The Democrat Party Is Held Accountable for the Crap They’ve Visited on This Country

19 May 4, 2015
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

"You arent trying to depress me?? Well you do -- and I am already torqued off as we a…"

Carlos Ramos replied Apr 29, 2015 to None of This Will Ever End Until The Democrat Party Is Held Accountable for the Crap They’ve Visited on This Country

19 May 4, 2015
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

ADMIN

"One week away, one day away or one year away -- Iran is not a country you trust with…"

Carlos Ramos replied Apr 22, 2015 to Declassified Material PROVES Obama Lied About Iran’s Nuclear Programs

25 Jun 3
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

"Tribal Identities?  Obama - based on what he says never experienced living a tribal…"

Carlos Ramos replied Apr 17, 2015 to What the Unearthed 1995 Video Tells Us about Obama

30 Apr 18, 2015
Reply by Wyman Bess

ADMIN

"I have been saying this all along and now We The People are at a point where the obv…"

Carlos Ramos replied Apr 15, 2015 to BOMBSHELL: Afghan Colonel Was Paid $250,000 to Kill U.S. Air Force Personnel, Pentagon Cover-Up Ensued

22 Apr 17, 2015
Reply by Frankmusic

ADMIN

"Both - Loretta Lynch being kick out of the building on her butt and your demise will…"

Carlos Ramos replied Apr 15, 2015 to Al Sharpton Launches 'Hunger' Strike Until Loretta Lynch Is Confirmed

107 Apr 20, 2015
Reply by Larry Taylor

ADMIN

"DO some research RE Cruz and so what? -- Walker and Cruz are light years better than…"

Carlos Ramos replied Mar 31, 2015 to Crushing Cruz: The Media’s Worst Attacks on the GOP Presidential Candidate

38 Mar 31, 2015
Reply by Dale Heathman

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service