Joseph Fields's Discussions (208)

Discussions Replied To (208) Replies Latest Activity

"As the church-lady would say....Well...isn't that speciaaal, my special moment will…"

Joseph Fields replied Jan 16, 2017 to Matt Lauer Says He ‘Burst Out Crying’ Watching Obama Award Biden Medal of Freedom

49 Jan 18, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic


"So So Sad.....all she wanted to do was to destroy and dissolve America into the dism…"

Joseph Fields replied Dec 17, 2016 to Hillary Clinton’s holiday party ‘like a wake’

24 Dec 22, 2016
Reply by Joe Tatman

"Putin better behave......or obama with show his "flexibility""

Joseph Fields replied Dec 17, 2016 to Putin Lashes Out At Obama: "Show Some Proof Or Shut Up"

54 Jan 4, 2017
Reply by Philip D. Steenbergen

"I was walking in the park one day and saw six men beating barack obama profusely abo…"

Joseph Fields replied Dec 17, 2016 to Putin Lashes Out At Obama: "Show Some Proof Or Shut Up"

54 Jan 4, 2017
Reply by Philip D. Steenbergen

"What kind of parents would let their children go unattended and essentially give up…"

Joseph Fields replied Dec 1, 2016 to Border Patrol Chief: Agents Forced To Serve As ‘Professional Child Care Providers’

14 Dec 2, 2016
Reply by Norma R. Thompson


"Wonderful, you can have the illegals, the "refugees" and you (Cal.) can show the wor…"

Joseph Fields replied Nov 23, 2016 to Californians might vote in 2018 on taking steps toward secession in a 'Calexit'

112 Dec 3, 2016
Reply by D.Lee

"Where's a spray bottle filled with pig blood when you need one? islam (the cult of p…"

Joseph Fields replied Sep 19, 2016 to London’s Muslim Mayor Khan Opens U.S. Tour With ‘Bridges, Not Walls’ Jibe At Trump

15 Sep 21, 2016


"A simple solution: a couple of crop dusters filled with hog blood, spray the entire…"

Joseph Fields replied Sep 15, 2016 to Meeting on Georgia mosque canceled after militia video surfaces

32 Sep 15, 2016
Reply by Marilyn Calkins


"Oh yeah.......he's been "working" alright! just not for US. Obastard !!"

Joseph Fields replied Sep 14, 2016 to Trump to Obama: ​SHOULDN’T YOU BE AT WORK?

43 Sep 16, 2016
Reply by Randal W. Howard

"Hay, what's the big deal......I've already named 35 demons after him."

Joseph Fields replied Sep 11, 2016 to Can’t Make This Up: New Blood-Sucking Parasite Named After Obama

25 Sep 11, 2016
Reply by Debra A Shawver




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service