Johnny S. Guido's Discussions (29)

Discussions Replied To (28) Replies Latest Activity

" I agree with Mr. Parker.  They ALL have to go!  Start from a clean slate. Starting…"

Johnny S. Guido replied Apr 19, 2014 to The only answer is to vote all incumbents out of office in their next election!

188 Apr 27, 2014
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"I am no fan of Mr. Obama or his minions or his policies.  In fact, I would like noth…"

Johnny S. Guido replied Apr 2, 2014 to Pothead Gets 25 Years for Trying to Kill Obama

89 Apr 21, 2014
Reply by Joseph Nicholas Hite III


"This is very sad!  Someone in the present administration is a very delusional person…"

Johnny S. Guido replied Jan 16, 2014 to Government Retaliates Against Navy Chaplain who Sued over Government Shutdown of Catholic Mass

31 Jan 17, 2014
Reply by Frances D Carlson


"Yet another duplication of effort, paid for by the American tax payer.  Looks good o…"

Johnny S. Guido replied Jan 9, 2014 to White House Fact Sheet: President Obama’s Promise Zones Initiative

33 Jan 13, 2014
Reply by sr williams


"I agree!  I am one of those disabled Vets, and I served for 20 years in the USN.   I…"

Johnny S. Guido replied Dec 30, 2013 to Jedi Mind Trick? Pelosi Says Extending Unemployment Benefits 'Could Produce As Many As 300,000 Jobs'

71 Jan 2, 2014
Reply by Jeff Noncent


"I follow your train of thought and agree.  Personally I didn't want to sound racst e…"

Johnny S. Guido replied Dec 17, 2013 to Gingrich: This is baloney! Every major poverty-stricken city is run by Democrats

34 Dec 17, 2013
Reply by TopDrifter 1SG Retired

"So, that is how Michelle keeps her hold on "Sissy Obomie"  (heheheh)"

Johnny S. Guido replied Oct 8, 2013 to Military commissaries closed, but look what’s open for ‘President Stompy Foot’ . . .

62 Oct 11, 2013
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)


"Mr. Obama is a "Lame Duck President".  He should rersign with what dignity he can mu…"

Johnny S. Guido replied Sep 29, 2013 to House To Insist On One Year Delay Of Obamacare, Making Shutdown All But Inevitable

122 Oct 3, 2013
Reply by robert cosenza




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service