Susan E. Rajchel's Discussions (393)

Discussions Replied To (388) Replies Latest Activity

"   so who believes this doc about the killing of Bin Laden?  I have been told that h…"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Nov 12, 2014 to Secret Service discloses 40 barrier-jumping incidents

13 Nov 14, 2014
Reply by Thomas T Taylor

"sh.!!!!  I live in Phx and this judge we can't get rid of but the RINOS that are in…"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Nov 8, 2014 to Arizona's immigrant smuggling law struck down

27 Nov 11, 2014
Reply by Christine Puliselic

ADMIN

"he is the top ILLEGAL DEPORT HIM NOW!!!!"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Nov 7, 2014 to Immigration dispute erupts during bipartisan lunch

74 Nov 25, 2014
Reply by Virgil Earl Koon

ADMIN

"total lie and the more humanity the more CO2  they are bent on destroying the planet…"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Nov 2, 2014 to Planet headed toward ‘irreversible’ climate damage, UN warns

47 Nov 4, 2014
Reply by Frankmusic

"I agree with Ronald"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Oct 28, 2014 to Priebus Rallies Base: GOP Will Stop Obama's 'Un-American' Amnesty if We Win Senate

22 Oct 29, 2014
Reply by DeniseInAZ

"Soros!  they are all prostitutes This money has to go we need people not their freak…"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Oct 22, 2014 to Democracy Alliance Dark Money Network Spends Millions for Udall

8 Oct 22, 2014
Reply by Fisherman Pat

ADMIN

"when will they ever wake up The democraps are the racists and always have been   Ov…"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Oct 21, 2014 to The Smell of Desperation: Dem Flier Uses Lynching Image, Warns Of ‘Obama’s Impeachment’ If Democrat Loses

38 Oct 24, 2014
Reply by DeniseInAZ

"He did and so did others 4 shots to the head the real tape has emerged and clearly s…"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Oct 18, 2014 to Jackie Kennedy believed Lyndon Johnson killed JFK

54 Oct 25, 2014
Reply by Spencer J. "Pick" Lyman

ADMIN

"thank you June I like to call and chew him a new butt  you can also get him on his F…"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Oct 18, 2014 to SENATE JUDICIARY REPUBLICANS TO OBAMA: STOP ISSUING VISAS TO EBOLA-STRICKEN COUNTRIES NOW

36 Oct 22, 2014
Reply by Joseph T. Ward

ADMIN

"He is Kyl's and Mccains butt boy People did not know the estab people vote for them…"

Susan E. Rajchel replied Oct 18, 2014 to SENATE JUDICIARY REPUBLICANS TO OBAMA: STOP ISSUING VISAS TO EBOLA-STRICKEN COUNTRIES NOW

36 Oct 22, 2014
Reply by Joseph T. Ward

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service