Brenda Choate's Discussions (585)

Discussions Replied To (585) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"Obama and the democratic members of the house and senate have never been interested…"

Brenda Choate replied Dec 4, 2015 to White House threatens shutdown to stop GOP policies

72 Dec 9, 2015
Reply by Mary Ann West

ADMIN

"Oh but Hillary, they do know you well. Everyone knows that you and your positions ca…"

Brenda Choate replied Dec 2, 2015 to HILLARY: "YEAH I TOOK MONEY, BUT THAT'S NOTHING TO DO WITH MY POSITIONS"

30 Dec 17, 2015
Reply by Francine DiNapoli

ADMIN

"What do your mean "go to war with America".  He has been at war with America from th…"

Brenda Choate replied Nov 23, 2015 to Bitter Obama Prepares To Go To War…With America

73 Nov 28, 2015
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

"A rather convoluted way to introduce a subject that not only did not apply to Americ…"

Brenda Choate replied Nov 19, 2015 to Washington Post: The Statue of Liberty depicts a Muslim woman

34 Nov 21, 2015
Reply by Richard Rooney Sr.

ADMIN

"Since the established politicians have done such a remarkable job carrying out Natio…"

Brenda Choate replied Nov 18, 2015 to GOP leaders: National security will end Carson and Trump campaigns

106 Nov 24, 2015
Reply by K. Ness

"Here in the good ole USA.  We, the citizens of America, are demonized daily because…"

Brenda Choate replied Nov 10, 2015 to Germany’s new normal: “People can’t leave their homes” “Migrants go into churches to disrupt service. They walk in and start to riot.”

178 Nov 17, 2015
Reply by H. Gregory Badger

ADMIN

"After years of taking money from workers with the promise of getting it back, they n…"

Brenda Choate replied Nov 9, 2015 to Congress Proposes A Chilling Resolution On Social Security

121 Nov 16, 2015
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

"Between the SPLC and the ACLU all Americans have lost their freedom to decide for th…"

Brenda Choate replied Nov 9, 2015 to THE SLANDER AND CORRUPTION OF THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER

16 Nov 9, 2015
Reply by Eugene P. Clark

ADMIN

"So you are critical of Trump because he will not outline his plan.  You are old enou…"

Brenda Choate replied Oct 27, 2015 to Lindsey Graham on GOP field: ‘How am I losing to these people?’

43 Oct 27, 2015
Reply by John Pastirchak

ADMIN

"Another prime example of why the government is incapable of running anything.  It se…"

Brenda Choate replied Oct 20, 2015 to Senator vows to block HHS nominees until Obama explains why third of health care co-ops have failed

16 Oct 21, 2015
Reply by Fisherman Pat

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service