Pat Chadwell's Discussions (614)

Discussions Replied To (196) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"I hope something happens before he orders the terrorist to really attack.. Also I ha…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 11, 2012 to Federal court strikes down Illinois ban on carrying concealed weapons

32 Dec 13, 2012
Reply by Terrence D. Durrill

ADMIN

"Illinois gets there hand guns back for open carry and Obama sends 16 F16 fighter jet…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 11, 2012 to Federal court strikes down Illinois ban on carrying concealed weapons

32 Dec 13, 2012
Reply by Terrence D. Durrill

"Yep they are moving to AZ, NV and other states that have some kind of jobs..."

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 11, 2012 to Californians could face ‘double taxation’ with state, federal carbon taxes

33 Dec 12, 2012
Reply by Joe Marshall

"No look at Arabia and who runs that country or Egypt now for that is what Obama is l…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 11, 2012 to Californians could face ‘double taxation’ with state, federal carbon taxes

33 Dec 12, 2012
Reply by Joe Marshall

ADMIN

"Not as long as Holder is in charge of the DOJ.... For he is working for the brotherh…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 11, 2012 to Federal court strikes down Illinois ban on carrying concealed weapons

32 Dec 13, 2012
Reply by Terrence D. Durrill

ADMIN

"The bad part is that more likly something bad will happen to the fed Judge that went…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 11, 2012 to Federal court strikes down Illinois ban on carrying concealed weapons

32 Dec 13, 2012
Reply by Terrence D. Durrill

"The carbon tax is being pushed by the government.. Its not really about carbon but t…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 11, 2012 to Californians could face ‘double taxation’ with state, federal carbon taxes

33 Dec 12, 2012
Reply by Joe Marshall

"Thats just the ones we know about.. I wonder how many there are that we dont know ab…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 10, 2012 to Obama jumps headfirst into fight over Michigan 'right-to-work' law

40 Dec 12, 2012
Reply by MAK

"Well its a fact that Congress and the Senate will not check the illegal so he can be…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 10, 2012 to Obama jumps headfirst into fight over Michigan 'right-to-work' law

40 Dec 12, 2012
Reply by MAK

ADMIN

"If DHS were gone then the terrorist could not have the over35 terrorist trainning ca…"

Pat Chadwell replied Dec 10, 2012 to Department of Homeland Pork

21 Dec 31, 2012
Reply by al pambuena

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service