Steven Codekas's Discussions (606)

Discussions Replied To (604) Replies Latest Activity

"Excellent!"

Steven Codekas replied Jul 6, 2014 to First news coverage of the Declaration of Independence found

4 Jul 7, 2014
Reply by Kenneth Hall

ADMIN

"Okay, Richard. Quick answer: abortion clinics should not get any tax dollars at all…"

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to Planned Parenthood Gives Award for Exceeding Abortion Quotas

34 Jul 5, 2014
Reply by Steven Codekas

"Do they get extra-extra points if they start to stink?"

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to Oh Dear! University offers female students extra credit for not shaving their armpits

59 Jul 8, 2014
Reply by DeniseInAZ

"lol, but freedom is never free at the Mint."

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to Michael Savage: Media 'hiding' illegal-Invader disease threat

25 Jul 6, 2014
Reply by John Thomas Dunlap

ADMIN

"And this doesn't even count the criminal aliens who sneak over here for benefits and…"

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to We've Crossed The Tipping Point; Most Americans Now Receive Government Benefits

15 Jul 6, 2014
Reply by Michael Dennis Smith

"Nothing, as usual, as congress has nothing clangling between their legs."

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to HHS adds 1296 pages of Regulations to ObamaCare

35 Jul 7, 2014
Reply by TNSteve

"1296 pages of HHS confusing? Nah. Not at all. It's all bullshit. Problem solved. You…"

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to HHS adds 1296 pages of Regulations to ObamaCare

35 Jul 7, 2014
Reply by TNSteve

"You said it, Christine. We could fertilize the Sahara with all of congress's manure…"

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to Congressman Says Discovery of E-Mail “Likely to Start Impeachment of Obama”

78 Jul 8, 2014
Reply by Frankmusic

ADMIN

"Good, ol' Monsanto, who supplied the Agent Orange that is quite slowly killing me an…"

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to Who is Foreign Aid For? Foreigners or U.S. Corporations?

18 Jul 12, 2014
Reply by John H. Briggs, Sr.

ADMIN

"It is for both and politicians. Everyone but patriots."

Steven Codekas replied Jul 5, 2014 to Who is Foreign Aid For? Foreigners or U.S. Corporations?

18 Jul 12, 2014
Reply by John H. Briggs, Sr.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service