LYNN EDWARD DECKER's Discussions (1,718)

Discussions Replied To (1717) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"THANK YOU DEE....!! YOU ARE A PATRIOT AND A GREAT AMERICAN....!!  SMILES TO YOU...!…"

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Mar 5, 2017 to I am retiring.....

334 Mar 21, 2017
Reply by Dee

ADMIN

"Something like this???? ............................................................…"

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Mar 5, 2017 to LORETTA LYNCH: NEED MORE MARCHING, BLOOD, DEATH ON STREETS

110 Mar 14, 2017
Reply by Lyn Rogers

"LOL....!! YOUR ON YOUR OWN with that one.....!! "

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Mar 5, 2017 to Coddled and Broken Millennials Now Need “Adulting School”

46 Mar 5, 2017
Reply by LYNN EDWARD DECKER

ADMIN

"I AM JUST PLAIN SICK OF THESE VIOLENCE ADVOCATING DEMOCRATS.....!! INCITING RIOTS AN…"

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Mar 5, 2017 to LORETTA LYNCH: NEED MORE MARCHING, BLOOD, DEATH ON STREETS

110 Mar 14, 2017
Reply by Lyn Rogers

"BILL THEM FOR THE CLEAN-UP AND FINE THEM....!! IF they do not pay..., PUT SANCTIONS…"

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Mar 5, 2017 to Mexico Deliberately Pollutes San Diego Beaches with Massive 143 Million Gallon Sewage Spill

90 Mar 28, 2017
Reply by Philip D. Steenbergen

ADMIN

"PURGE..., THEY were put in there TO CAUSE TROUBLE.., DISRUPT....., and TO LEAK TO TH…"

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Mar 4, 2017 to Trump Advisers Call For A 'Purge' Of Obama Appointees

48 Apr 27, 2017
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

ADMIN

"TRUMP WILL TROMP THE ISSUES...., JUST GIVE HIM TIME....! HE'S OUR PRESIDENT.....!! "

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Mar 1, 2017 to President Trump’s Address to the Nation

33 Mar 4, 2017
Reply by Nash Hansotia

" CRIMINAL ALIENS THAT COMMIT VIOLENT CRIMES SHOULD BE PUT TO DEATH IMMEDIATELY....!!…"

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Mar 1, 2017 to Who Is Committing Crimes In The United States?

69 Mar 4, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"THESE PEOPLE CAN'T EVEN GET THEIR BEST PICTURE CHOICE RIGHT....!! Why would anyone l…"

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Feb 28, 2017 to Actors Sport Blue Ribbons at Oscars To Protest Trump’s Stance on Immigration

37 Mar 2, 2017
Reply by Arron Armand Grottolo

"Yes.., and SLANDER that damages people...., business and even can cost lives..., etc…"

LYNN EDWARD DECKER replied Feb 27, 2017 to FAKE NEWS: Media Says Trump Supporters Waved Russian Flags at CPAC, Omit Fact it was a Leftist Stunt

49 Mar 2, 2017
Reply by Oleg Gielman

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service