Joanne Mortensen's Discussions (1,057)

Discussions Replied To (1055) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"AMEN !"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 21, 2017 to 11-Year-Old Docked Points for Not Bashing Trump

45 Feb 22, 2017
Reply by Charles S Imwold

ADMIN

"It would be more appropriate to use it against democrat, and rino politicians"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 21, 2017 to Democrats Suggest Invoking The 25th Amendment Unless Trump "Gets A Grip"

74 Feb 23, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

"Considering that every time obama opened his mouth he was lying .. what is it that w…"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 21, 2017 to Democrats Suggest Invoking The 25th Amendment Unless Trump "Gets A Grip"

74 Feb 23, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"About time someone with common sense is fighting this perverted decision"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 15, 2017 to Trump Justice Department Signals An End To Transgender Locker Room Lunacy In Public Schools

19 Feb 15, 2017
Reply by John Barr

"Where are you getting that title "supreme leader"  we have a President . Who is foll…"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 15, 2017 to Limbaugh: White House Leaks Are A Bigger Problem Than Flynn’s Phone Call

25 Feb 16, 2017
Reply by Paul Simmon

ADMIN

"America wake up obama is a bad dude .. he promised change and he did it .. America h…"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 12, 2017 to Obama is scheming to sabotage Trump’s presidency

45 Feb 13, 2017
Reply by Thomas sandoval

ADMIN

"We all need to get on our knees to GOD .. ask for the salvation of out Nation.. We h…"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 12, 2017 to University of Central FL Socialist Club Incites Young Kids To "Kill Donald Trump"

31 Feb 14, 2017
Reply by Philip D. Steenbergen

ADMIN

"Proof of citizenship is absolutely needed .. there should be a federal voter registr…"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 12, 2017 to Arrogant Illegal Alien Who Voted 5 TIMES in Presidential Election Just Got VERY Bad News

65 Feb 14, 2017
Reply by Randal W. Howard

ADMIN

"If you want to count in California there are probably 3 million illegal voters, and…"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 12, 2017 to Arrogant Illegal Alien Who Voted 5 TIMES in Presidential Election Just Got VERY Bad News

65 Feb 14, 2017
Reply by Randal W. Howard

ADMIN

"OH BOY! do we ever need that wall and stop all the illegal traffic .. !"

Joanne Mortensen replied Feb 12, 2017 to Mexican Drug Cartel Operating in U.S. Suburb More than 1,500 Miles from Border

32 Feb 24, 2017
Reply by Anthony Ibbott

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service