Charles Bill L.CDurry's Discussions (1,715)

Discussions Replied To (1710) Replies Latest Activity

"It is plain that the GOP bigboys is not getting who they picked to lose to Hillary C…"

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Mar 16, 2016 to What Would You Be Willing To Do If The GOP Steals The Nomination?

6320 Aug 26, 2016
Reply by American 1st


"A hardshell Baptist is a Hard shell Baptist,a Baptist is a Baptist,A Pentecost is a…"


23 Mar 16, 2016
Reply by M-AR-15-5.56X45!


"She is only fit to be an maggot inspector."

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Feb 11, 2016 to HILLARY CLINTON’S DOCTOR’S NOTE: SHE IS ‘FIT TO SERVE’

42 Feb 12, 2016
Reply by Skip peters

"Should the attempt such sh*t on my daughters is when the would meet their allah and…"

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Jan 25, 2016 to Muslim Migrants Masturbate Into Jacuzzi, Defecate In Kid’s Pool, Invade Girls Changing Rooms

80 Apr 5, 2016


"This is not suprising is it??Sameo Sameo."

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Jan 18, 2016 to Too funny! Dumb Debbie Wasserman Schultz Gets a Primary Challenger

20 Jan 19, 2016
Reply by Douglas W. Rodrigues


"I stopped watching Glen Beck when he said what he did about stopping Social Security…"

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Jan 16, 2016 to 'He looks like hell': Donald Trump unloads on Glenn Beck after being accused of voting for Obama

107 Jan 18, 2016
Reply by Healani


"The idiots who run PC countries are nothing but stupid ninnys.You let one of those p…"

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Jan 14, 2016 to Hungarian Paper Slams Merkel: ‘No Bastards On Earth More Abominable Than Liberal Pigs Digging Europe’s Grave

16 Jan 17, 2016
Reply by Anna C Kania


"When Cruz said Satan was behind the supreme court on accepting Faggot marriage he wa…"

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Jan 10, 2016 to PBS: Ted Cruz and His Father Are ‘Satanic’

47 Jan 13, 2016
Reply by Elaine Morris


"Oh yes I don't drink either nor allow someone who does around me when they are."

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Dec 29, 2015 to Wave of regulations looms in 2016

23 Dec 30, 2015
Reply by sharon ostwinch


"All cigarettes and tobacco can be done away with for my part.I donot allow people to…"

Charles Bill L.CDurry replied Dec 29, 2015 to Wave of regulations looms in 2016

23 Dec 30, 2015
Reply by sharon ostwinch




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service