Gray Jones's Discussions (2,129)

Discussions Replied To (2123) Replies Latest Activity

"This election is very deceptive. Should we call the winners 'city councilmen' or 'ne…"

Gray Jones replied Nov 11, 2015 to New Muslim Majority City Council in Michigan Warns, “Today we show the [non-Muslims] and everybody else….”

43 Nov 16, 2015
Reply by Joseph T. Ward

ADMIN

"It's pretty apparent the powers that be are logistically located at the very bottom…"

Gray Jones replied Nov 9, 2015 to Defense Secretary Suggests Putin Might Nuke America, Says US Will "Defend International Order"

33 Nov 10, 2015
Reply by Michael G. Thompson

"Fear merchants releasing one of their toys to keep our heads down...Semper Fi Nam 66…"

Gray Jones replied Nov 9, 2015 to Why Did The U.S. Launch A Nuclear Missile That Would Be Visible From L.A. Without Any Warning?

41 Nov 13, 2015
Reply by Viper

ADMIN

"Simply put this video is talking about "The Third Party Law" which states: For two i…"

Gray Jones replied Nov 7, 2015 to German reporter says CIA and other intelligence agencies bribe journalists to write lies

49 Nov 14, 2015
Reply by Dale Heathman

ADMIN

"The equation is simple, i.e. no guns = communism.  It's where the rubber meets the r…"

Gray Jones replied Nov 3, 2015 to DAILY BEAST: OBAMA, HILLARY TOYING WITH ‘CIVIL WAR’ OVER GUN CONFISCATION

61 Nov 5, 2015
Reply by Robert N. Schick

"You don't get to Obama's oval office without being anointed by Rockefeller's gang. L…"

Gray Jones replied Oct 26, 2015 to Evidence grows: Impeach Obama now or America will go extinct.

48 Nov 1, 2015
Reply by Wayne Henry Braden

ADMIN

"I'd rather Oath Keepers do the job...Semper Fi Nam 66-67"

Gray Jones replied Oct 18, 2015 to Carson and Trump to Get Secret Service Protection: Threats have been off the charts...

22 Oct 19, 2015
Reply by DeniseInAZ

"DOJ is pretty much putting themselves in the cross-hairs of those who still believe…"

Gray Jones replied Oct 15, 2015 to White America Targeted by DOJ... the new face of terrorism is white supremast and others

63 Oct 28, 2015
Reply by Jimmy Weber

ADMIN

"Lady Justice, blind-folded, with her scales in one hand and sword in the other, evok…"

Gray Jones replied Oct 12, 2015 to Tea Party wave that lifted Republicans threatens to engulf them

33 Oct 14, 2015
Reply by June Gagnon

ADMIN

"The Tea Party of WTP are positioning ourselves to settle this malfunction at the Dem…"

Gray Jones replied Oct 10, 2015 to RUSH LIMBAUGH: GOP IMPLOSION FEARED BY ‘ESTABLISHMENT OF BOTH PARTIES’

23 Oct 11, 2015
Reply by Jane Binkley

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service