Tom Wyckoff's Discussions (84)

Discussions Replied To (84) Replies Latest Activity

"There is nothing I can do to stop or change this blatant waste of tax payer monies,…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Apr 28, 2014 to Federal Registration System Swamped And Pentagon To Destroy $1 Billion Worth Of Ammunition

89 May 1, 2014
Reply by James Andrews

ADMIN

"Clooney, is as beg ass-hole as his asshole buddy, Obama. Look! They even look alike…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Apr 27, 2014 to George Clooney got into a fight with Las Vegas casino mogul Steve Wynn: Wynn called Obama an A**hole

56 Apr 27, 2014
Reply by Tom Wyckoff

ADMIN

"F(Screw)k Obama AND the United Nations! Why don't they try to come and get um? Tom…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Apr 18, 2014 to U.S.-EU Statement Calls for Civilian Disarmament

86 Apr 20, 2014
Reply by Ted I Lewis

"HELLO ! ,,,,,,, Sheeples,,,,,,,, Wake Up! You do not have to ask "what is it going…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Apr 16, 2014 to Obama Requests $1.1 Billion, DOJ $382.1 Million for Gun Control

45 Apr 16, 2014
Reply by Tom Wyckoff

ADMIN

"Message to Bloomberg, Sir,,,, you do not have to do anything special to, as you say…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Apr 16, 2014 to Demented Bloomberg on NRA: We have to make them afraid of us

48 Apr 17, 2014
Reply by Michael S. Leinbach

"Obama,,,, is a want-a-be dictator! A tyrannical deadbeat! Not deserving one of the h…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Apr 1, 2014 to Obama to Military Brass: Agree With Me on Gay Policy or Get Out

36 Apr 5, 2014
Reply by James Frankin

ADMIN

"Opinion,,,,, BOTH these fat faced cops should be FIRED fron the department. I do not…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Mar 30, 2014 to Cop Stays On The Job After Brutally Beating Jewish Man In His Own Synagogue

99 Apr 5, 2014
Reply by Frances Drake

"U N DEMAND! If the u.n. Wants Obamacare for illegal aliens,,,, THE U.N. Can take bo…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Mar 30, 2014 to United Nations Panel Demands ObamaCare Coverage for Illegal Aliens, Denounces ‘Racist’ Voter ID Laws

102 Apr 1, 2014
Reply by Michael Orman Iverson

ADMIN

"F€#K CONNIE JANE FONDA ! ! ! Her dad,,,, he was great. She is a F$@king communist!…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Mar 25, 2014 to Jane Fonda To Be Honored As Example Of Using Fame To Do Good

71 Mar 25, 2014
Reply by Ron Brooks

"Should Obama actually be interested in any degree of American "Self- Determination"…"

Tom Wyckoff replied Mar 18, 2014 to Obama Declares Self-Determination To Be A Threat To US National Security

55 Mar 18, 2014
Reply by I B Marshall

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service