Patsy Harper's Discussions (30)

Discussions Replied To (30) Replies Latest Activity

"Who are the three you are speaking of Rev.?"

Patsy Harper replied Apr 10, 2016 to What Would You Be Willing To Do If The GOP Steals The Nomination?

6320 Aug 26, 2016
Reply by American 1st

"I agree Rev. Featherstone. We must nominate one of the two candidates chosen by the…"

Patsy Harper replied Apr 10, 2016 to What Would You Be Willing To Do If The GOP Steals The Nomination?

6320 Aug 26, 2016
Reply by American 1st

"We desperately need the CoS! We will never fix this den of thieves until we have ter…"

Patsy Harper replied Jan 6, 2015 to Mark Levin Makes POWERFUL Case for Article V Convention of the States

223 Jan 29, 2015
Reply by kathyet

ADMIN

"Is the US Gog or Magog?"

Patsy Harper replied Mar 12, 2014 to Obama: US won’t be able to defend Israel if peace talks fail

207 Mar 15, 2014
Reply by Oleg Gielman

ADMIN

"Nope. He is not ignorant. He is trying to destroy Israel along with the US"

Patsy Harper replied Mar 12, 2014 to Obama: US won’t be able to defend Israel if peace talks fail

207 Mar 15, 2014
Reply by Oleg Gielman

ADMIN

"OMG!! I didnt think about that."

Patsy Harper replied Mar 3, 2014 to McCain: Obama smartest man in the room

106 Jul 21, 2015
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

"Sounds like he has what it takes to be President of our country. Gonna be watching t…"

Patsy Harper replied Mar 2, 2014 to Ret. Navy Pilot Held Captive by the Chinese Reveals Why He’s Running for Senate: ‘Not on My Watch’

26 Mar 2, 2014
Reply by Patsy Harper

ADMIN

"He must be stopped."

Patsy Harper replied Feb 28, 2014 to All the President's IRS Agents

39 Mar 7, 2014
Reply by al pambuena

"I cant wait to see it!"

Patsy Harper replied Feb 22, 2014 to Ukrainian MPs vote to oust President Yanukovych

29 Feb 24, 2014
Reply by Steven G. Elliott 1SG USA (RET)

"I agree 100%. If we can't replace most of the old guard this year, the Party is dead…"

Patsy Harper replied Feb 21, 2014 to Allen West Not Ruling Out 2016 Presidential Run

54 Mar 3, 2014
Reply by Burgo

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service