Randal W. Howard's Discussions (3,470)

Discussions Replied To (3470) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"Evidence Not Required for Impeachment   Really?  How come Obumbum avoided it for SOO…"

Randal W. Howard replied Apr 20, 2017 to Dem Rep Waters: Trump ‘Investigation’ Underway; Evidence Not Required for Impeachment

127 May 10, 2017
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

ADMIN

"OFF TOPIC.... I haven't seen a new "CHECK OUT" article in a couple of weeks. I hope…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 14, 2017 to NEW DNC DEPUTY KEITH ELLISON'S ISLAMIC AGENDA FOR CONGRESS

38 Mar 14, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

""...supreme court declared unconstitutional in 1894.." Yes, and they told us in 1917…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 6, 2017 to Obama's Legacy: Half Of College Students Now Expect Taxpayers To Bail Them Out

30 Mar 6, 2017
Reply by Charles Teachout

ADMIN

"I knew a young man about 50 years ago who started college, and QUIT after a very sho…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 6, 2017 to Obama's Legacy: Half Of College Students Now Expect Taxpayers To Bail Them Out

30 Mar 6, 2017
Reply by Charles Teachout

ADMIN

"I saw something a while back on Discovery or one of the similar TV channels.  Seems…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 6, 2017 to Nevada Rancher Ordered To Pay $500,000 For Cattle That Grazed On Federal Land A Decade Ago

48 Mar 9, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

""...THE PRESIDING JUDGES ALWAYS SIDE WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT". Of course!  One o…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 6, 2017 to Nevada Rancher Ordered To Pay $500,000 For Cattle That Grazed On Federal Land A Decade Ago

48 Mar 9, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

""FEDERAL LAND".  Anybody see a FORT, or a DOCKYARD, or an ARSONAL, or 'OTHER NEEDFUL…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 6, 2017 to Nevada Rancher Ordered To Pay $500,000 For Cattle That Grazed On Federal Land A Decade Ago

48 Mar 9, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

"There MUST be a Statute of Limitations on this.  10 YEARS?  None of the cattle graze…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 5, 2017 to Nevada Rancher Ordered To Pay $500,000 For Cattle That Grazed On Federal Land A Decade Ago

48 Mar 9, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

"Not sure, but I think he really IS!  I still have not seen an disputable BIRTH CERTI…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 5, 2017 to Obama's Legacy: Half Of College Students Now Expect Taxpayers To Bail Them Out

30 Mar 6, 2017
Reply by Charles Teachout

ADMIN

"We have enough of these people HERE, who came from HERE.  We do NOT need to invite t…"

Randal W. Howard replied Mar 5, 2017 to Chuck Schumer Helped Accused Child Sex Predator Obtain U.S. Visa

30 Mar 6, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service