John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret.'s Discussions (666)

Discussions Replied To (665) Replies Latest Activity

"I believe it started back in the 60's when the new religion of get high, free love a…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Sep 4, 2017 to West Virginia Students Take Stand For Jesus Christ, Immediately Get Suspended

8 Sep 4, 2017
Reply by Jea9

"You'd be surprised just how many good ones there are. When you are on the street you…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 25, 2017 to Antifa website calls for violence against Trump supporters

19 Aug 27, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

"Well, I guess we can see who are the racist in this story and sure wasn't the young…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 23, 2017 to Girls Kicked Off DC College Campus For Wearing Trump Hat

4 Aug 24, 2017
Reply by Jea9

"So, true, Marilyn. Oh, have you ever noticed how all those great Dictators's Militar…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 22, 2017 to Antifa website calls for violence against Trump supporters

19 Aug 27, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

"If they love their ideology so great why do they cover their faces. Oh, yeah, they'r…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 22, 2017 to Antifa website calls for violence against Trump supporters

19 Aug 27, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

"If she really wants to further Sharia Law in the US, she needs to resign from Congre…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 21, 2017 to Muslim Migrant In Washington Gunned Down As His Sword Lands Headshot On Officer

6 Aug 21, 2017
Reply by John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret.

"Thanks for your service, Col and I agree with you on the damage that b Hussein o did…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 4, 2017 to Want Some Free Guns? The Government Gave $1.2 Million Worth Of Military Gear To A Fake Police Department

4 Aug 4, 2017
Reply by John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret.

"Thanks for your service, Brother. I too had the same reaction as you did when I saw…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 4, 2017 to Dunkirk Survivor’s Reaction To New War Film Will Leave You Speechless

1 Aug 4, 2017
Reply by John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret.

"I'm glad I don't live in his county because I would be working my butt off trying to…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 4, 2017 to Oregon Sheriff Releases Alien Felon with Immigration Hold before 2 Women Assaulted

8 Aug 4, 2017
Reply by John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret.

"Yip, and you must not forget Hobby Lobby they stood up for their Christian ideals an…"

John P Wilch Jr (TSgt, USAF Ret. replied Aug 4, 2017 to Major Clothing Line Hurls Insult at Trump Supporters

13 Aug 4, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service