davidfarrar's Discussions (1,287)

Discussions Replied To (1108) Replies Latest Activity

"I think "deportation" is the key to understanding why it's only a misdemeanor. It's…"

davidfarrar replied Nov 4, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"I think HR 140 'Birthright Citizenship Act of 2017' bill should also include a secti…"

davidfarrar replied Nov 4, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"The law can't be retroactive. I was thinking, a DACA deal for birthright citizenship?"

davidfarrar replied Nov 2, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"I suppose there is lower court precedent"

davidfarrar replied Nov 2, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"I am not sure Obama's mother could have given up her baby's U.S. citizenship, even i…"

davidfarrar replied Nov 2, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"7 FAM 1113 NOT INCLUDED IN THE MEANING OF "IN THE UNITED STATES" C. Birth on U.S. Mi…"

davidfarrar replied Nov 2, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"If Obama wasn't born in Hawaii, he would not even be a U.S. citizen as his mother wa…"

davidfarrar replied Nov 2, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"Notwithstanding the fact that McCain may not have been born on the U.S. base hospita…"

davidfarrar replied Nov 2, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"I agree. An Art. II, § I, Cl. 5 natural born citizen is a person born exclusively un…"

davidfarrar replied Nov 1, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

"I agree. While Obama may be a birthright 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, he is not an A…"

davidfarrar replied Nov 1, 2018 to "Birthright Citizenship": Politics vs Rule of Law

320 Dec 5, 2018
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service