Peter Schmidt's Discussions (20)

Discussions Replied To (20) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"Sorry to see you go Dee. You have done a fabulous job all these years. You helped a…"

Peter Schmidt replied Mar 5 to I am retiring.....

334 Mar 21
Reply by Dee

ADMIN

"Pelosi is obviously suffering from some type of mental health issues. She appears to…"

Peter Schmidt replied Mar 3 to "The Attorney General Must Resign": Pelosi, Top Democrats Calls For Sessions' Immediate Termination

52 Mar 4
Reply by Frankmusic

"Millenials do have a job and responsibilities. Every morning they wake up and say, "…"

Peter Schmidt replied Feb 27 to Coddled and Broken Millennials Now Need “Adulting School”

46 Mar 5
Reply by LYNN EDWARD DECKER

"Investigate and remove this faux/war hero traitor, post haste!!"

Peter Schmidt replied Feb 27 to WikiLeaks: John McCain in 2008 illegally solicited campaign contribution from Russia

17 Feb 27
Reply by Archie C B

"Malloy there are laws on the books to hold you responsible, you are not only aiding…"

Peter Schmidt replied Feb 27 to Previously Deported Illegal Goes On Murderous Rampage Days After CT Gov Refused To Work With ICE

43 Mar 2
Reply by Rodney Heard

ADMIN

"Dems claim someone other than a protester, may start a riot or an intended peaceful…"

Peter Schmidt replied Feb 27 to Arizona Senate votes to seize assets of those who plan, participate in protests that turn violent

42 Mar 11
Reply by Robert William Metcalf

ADMIN

"What has happened to civility, and courtesy, yes, even good sportsmanship when you l…"

Peter Schmidt replied Feb 26 to Churlish Democrats Might Not Shake Trump's Hand at Joint Session

35 Feb 27
Reply by Robert N. Schick

ADMIN

"How come the McCain Institute is not under investigation?? We now know about McCains…"

Peter Schmidt replied Feb 26 to John McCain’s Great American Betrayal Called the “McCain Institute”

28 Mar 4
Reply by Charles S Imwold

"Is anyone (IRS)? checking into his 501-3cOFA for misappropriations, etc., and revoki…"

Peter Schmidt replied Feb 20 to Obama’s Shadow Presidency

30 Feb 23
Reply by Aristotle B Plato

"Obama is a man without a country. A 10' wall around his DC home  is no protection.He…"

Peter Schmidt replied Feb 20 to Obama’s Shadow Presidency

30 Feb 23
Reply by Aristotle B Plato

RSS

Diamond & Silk

Tea Party
Facebook & Twitter

ALERT ALERT

Breaking: Jury Sides With Sheriff Joe
Smacks Down Establishment GOP’s Lawsuit

A jury has sided in favor of conservative icon, former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, against the lawsuit filed by Austin Flake, the son of GOP establishment Senator Jeff Flake, and Austin’s ex-wife, Logan Brown.

Flake and Brown had filed a lawsuit against the Arizona sheriff for “malicious prosecution” after over a dozen dogs died on their watch at a Gilbert dog kennel.

The jury decided Flake and Brown had failed to provide sufficient evidence to back up their accusations of malicious prosecution by Arpaio, The Associated Press reported via Tucson.com.

Flake and Brown ran the kennel while Brown’s parents were out of town in 2014, the AP reported.

The two were still in college.

Initially, Flake and Brown were charged in the incident, but the charges were dropped at the prosecution’s request. Later, Flake’s in-laws pleaded guilty to animal cruelty charges after an expert determined that the facility air conditioner failed because it was not properly maintained.

Thus, the owners of the kennel were responsible for the death of the 21 dogs, and they answered for their crimes.

Nonetheless, Flake and Brown reportedly alleged that Arpaio had charged them to gain publicity and deal damage to Senator Flake — an establishment fixture within the GOP.

The two “contended the charges caused them emotional distress, contributed to the demise of their marriage and led the senator’s son to being suspended from college for an honor-code violation,” according to The Associated Press.

Despite the jury’s decision, the U.S. District Judge Neil V. Wake will not issue a final verdict until the defense explains why it didn’t turn over documents that may have benefited the plaintiffs, according to a statement from the plaintiffs’ attorney to The Associated Press.

“The struggle to hold government officials accountable has always required a steep, perilous climb,” the plaintiffs’ attorney said in a Friday statement according to KNPX.

“Although we disagree with the jury’s verdict, we are grateful we had the opportunity to force former Sheriff Arpaio and his subordinates at Maricopa County to account for their indisputably reckless conduct. Near the end of the trial, we discovered that the County failed to turn over documents that might have helped us prove our case,” he continued.

“The Court has ordered the County to explain its failure and indicated that it will not enter a final judgment in the case until a satisfactory explanation is provided. We will access our future options in this fight when the County complies with the Court’s Order.”

Charges that didn’t pan out are an annoyance to those affected — there’s no question of that.

But to claim that those charges — which were dropped — were the reason behind a failed marriage, and that Arpaio needs to pay is completely ridiculous.

What do you think about this story? Please share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know!

Are you glad about the jury’s decision? Scroll down to comment below!

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service