Teresa K. Chain's Discussions (184)

Discussions Replied To (182) Replies Latest Activity

"I will not abide by a traitors order, regardless. But on the other hand if I had to…"

Teresa K. Chain replied Jan 10, 2016 to Does The Empty Chair Speak For You?

40 Jan 17, 2016
Reply by Jea9

"I don't think they should be here period. No way should they have access to a gun..…"

Teresa K. Chain replied Jan 8, 2016 to Should Muslims Own Guns?

202 Jan 18, 2016
Reply by ivan scheu

ADMIN

"Herr Burgermiester."

Teresa K. Chain replied Dec 26, 2015 to Label this Photo!

34 Jan 1, 2016
Reply by Gary Lefebvre

ADMIN

"Can I please forward this??? 9 million times....."

Teresa K. Chain replied Dec 23, 2015 to Watch This Hilarious Parody Of The ’12 Days Of Winter’ Detailing How Liberal's Are Destroying Our Schools

15 Dec 24, 2015
Reply by roy veteto

ADMIN

"Karma....."

Teresa K. Chain replied Dec 13, 2015 to Federal Judge Who Outlawed Racial Profiling is Victim of Black Mob Violence

101 Dec 15, 2015
Reply by Honest Glenn

ADMIN

"Wow as for me this is one SHOOTING that has already been solved in my mind.. Flippin…"

Teresa K. Chain replied Dec 4, 2015 to Obama/Jarrett Warn FBI Director Over Anti-Muslim Tone

122 Dec 10, 2015
Reply by Charles E. Brown

ADMIN

"Sheriff Joe, ive got your back sir, and anyone elses that stands against the asshole…"

Teresa K. Chain replied Dec 3, 2015 to Arpaio calls on 250K armed citizens to stop terrorism and mass shootings

50 Apr 18, 2016
Reply by Lyn Agre

ADMIN

"The guy in the Springs,, No More Baby Parts. Who does that agenda belong to?? Oh yes…"

Teresa K. Chain replied Dec 3, 2015 to The President and Liberals Have a Lot to Answer For: San Bernardino Was Entirely Predictable

40 Dec 7, 2015
Reply by Mark Smithey

ADMIN

"Well what is his Asshole in Chief gonna do now,,??/ The plan has always been to disa…"

Teresa K. Chain replied Dec 3, 2015 to The President and Liberals Have a Lot to Answer For: San Bernardino Was Entirely Predictable

40 Dec 7, 2015
Reply by Mark Smithey

ADMIN

"The guy in the white house,, u know the muzzie in charge.. could care less.  Again,,…"

Teresa K. Chain replied Nov 5, 2015 to Dem Rep: SNL Is ‘Endangering Latinos’ By Allowing Trump To Host

22 Nov 8, 2015
Reply by Eugene P. Clark

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service