Kenneth Cariker's Discussions (236)

Discussions Replied To (236) Replies Latest Activity

"It has finally happened.  After the supreme court's decision on obamacare and now ga…"

Kenneth Cariker replied Jun 26, 2015 to Supreme Court's landmark ruling legalizes gay marriage nationwide

37 Jun 29, 2015
Reply by Elaine Morris

"Couldn't have said it better.  This country could become utopia tomorrow and the lib…"

Kenneth Cariker replied Jun 26, 2015 to The US Army’s Response To Confederate Base Names Is Perfect

59 Jul 31, 2015
Reply by Carla jones

ADMIN

"Liberals will never understand the concept that people can be against someone's ideo…"

Kenneth Cariker replied Jun 21, 2015 to Southern Poverty Law Center: Hate On The Rise Because Obama Is In The White House

62 Jun 22, 2015
Reply by Mangus Colorado

"You have to be either ignorant or dead to keep denying that obamawannabeking is a mu…"

Kenneth Cariker replied Jun 19, 2015 to IMPORTED MUSLIMS ARRIVING NOW IN THESE U.S. CITIES

25 Jun 21, 2015
Reply by Malcolm Rudd

ADMIN

"George,  you are exactly right.  OUR country has become the corrupt federal governme…"

Kenneth Cariker replied Jun 19, 2015 to Report: Blumenthal’s Benghazi Emails Withheld from Select Committee

7 Jun 19, 2015
Reply by John Barr

ADMIN

"There are only four groups in this country:  corrupt politicians, corrupt bureaucrat…"

Kenneth Cariker replied Jun 12, 2015 to State Department's Kennedy blocks security investigations

8 Jun 13, 2015
Reply by Bernard Miller

ADMIN

"Every day I read this stuff or hear about and feel like I am in a different universe…"

Kenneth Cariker replied Jun 7, 2015 to New York Judge: It's Racist To Expect Teachers To Know Things

56 Jun 10, 2015
Reply by Roberto Benitez

"Behead him on ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox.  If Christians had vandalized an islamic churc…"

Kenneth Cariker replied Jun 1, 2015 to Muslim arrested for vandalizing, desecrating Mississauga Catholic church

40 Jun 3, 2015
Reply by Gerald V. Todd

ADMIN

"There is no "Federal Government" - there is only a tyrannical power.  There are no r…"

Kenneth Cariker replied May 31, 2015 to This Is How Little It Cost Goldman To Bribe America's Senators To Fast Track Obama's TPP Bill

33 Jun 2, 2015
Reply by Archie C B

ADMIN

"Even if the republicrats get the information they say they are "demanding", they wil…"

Kenneth Cariker replied May 31, 2015 to GOP probes regulators over Craigslist ads

8 Jun 2, 2015
Reply by Skip peters

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service