Thomasa F. Leavins's Discussions (138)

Discussions Replied To (137) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"I am assuming that Obamas Iranian handler is staying close. I feel that three things…"

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Mar 3, 2017 to Valerie Jarrett Moves In With Obamas In DC "To Lead The Fight & Strategy To Topple Trump"

139 Mar 14, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"And the dems are afraid of Russia and trump talking with them. SESSIONS PROSECUTE."

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 28, 2017 to Senate to investigate Soros taxpayer funded meddling in elections

29 Mar 3, 2017
Reply by DeniseInAZ

ADMIN

"Cutting the budget is easy to explain, Obama and the Democrats spent it, Now they do…"

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 28, 2017 to Trump's new proposed budget cuts federal government down to size

28 Mar 5, 2017
Reply by Norma R. Thompson

ADMIN

"Michal I give you a big AMEN. this did not happen overnight."

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 26, 2017 to Border Patrol: DACA recipient detained for alien smuggling

16 Sep 2, 2017
Reply by Kristi Ann Mod

"Michael we can have justice, but first satan in Washington has to be purged. Trump h…"

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 19, 2017 to 71-Year-Old Dana Rohrabacher Staffer Knocked Unconscious by Anti-Trump Protesters

19 Feb 19, 2017
Reply by Jo Gonzalez

ADMIN

"Call Obama into the oval office and eject him from the country. Send him on a one wa…"

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 15, 2017 to Former Obama Officials, Loyalists Waged Secret Campaign to Oust Flynn

47 Feb 16, 2017
Reply by Jea9

ADMIN

"the real way to stop these liberals, give them an investigation. Start with Nancy fo…"

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 14, 2017 to Shoving Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals Right Back in the Left’s Ugly Face

19 Feb 15, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

"He needs to be called into the oval office. and be told if he does not disappear, se…"

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 12, 2017 to Obama is scheming to sabotage Trump’s presidency

45 Feb 13, 2017
Reply by Thomas sandoval

"The statement of you would expect this from California, but not Texas very true but…"

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 10, 2017 to UNREAL: What I’m witnessing here in Dallas right now is absolutely APPALLING

42 Feb 13, 2017
Reply by John Barr

ADMIN

"I found something exciting this week. A parking lot down from my house where the min…"

Thomasa F. Leavins replied Feb 5, 2017 to U.S. Gained 5,000 Manufacturing Jobs in January, Lost 10,000 Government Jobs

24 Feb 6, 2017
Reply by John Barr

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service