mark e. morris's Discussions (99)

Discussions Replied To (48) Replies Latest Activity


"Obama has already has over one million trips on bases all over the world right now t…"

mark e. morris replied Oct 4, 2013 to Priests threatened with arrest if they minister to military during shutdown

115 Oct 9, 2013
Reply by Barry Wind


"sorry every one this has nothing to do with wall street . I have question to ask . D…"

mark e. morris replied Oct 3, 2013 to Is Obama trying to panic Wall Street?

40 Oct 4, 2013
Reply by Tana W. Bernard


"Hay Obama if you love Muslim people so mush why don't you take your sorry ass back t…"

mark e. morris replied Jul 9, 2013 to Statement by Obama on the Occasion of Ramadan

67 Jul 10, 2013
Reply by Andrew


"Mr. west I thank it is time for you to say to all of WE THE PEOPLE that it is time f…"

mark e. morris replied Jul 1, 2013 to Allen West: The time draws near to teach this usurper and charlatan the lesson our forefathers taught King George III

60 Jul 4, 2013
Reply by Sonia Jones

"Allen WEST run in 2014 we the people need you now !!!!!!! . If your men were in the…"

mark e. morris replied Jun 20, 2013 to Allen West open to possibility of challenging Marco Rubio in Republican primary

65 Nov 19, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins


"I say fire this teacher and every one like him ! This man will be the first to ask f…"

mark e. morris replied Jun 1, 2013 to Ummm... Journalism Professor Calls For Firing Squad, Missile Attacks On The NRA

41 Jun 3, 2013
Reply by neal carmen toglia


"It is time for Obama the fag and bottom end taker to be removed from office ! I for…"

mark e. morris replied Jun 1, 2013 to Dangerous Times: Benghazi Revealed Obama Collusion with Al Qaida

43 Jun 3, 2013


"I am all for that frank ! we Americans need to take our country back from rag head O…"

mark e. morris replied May 19, 2013 to Muslims cancel annual Arab Festival because of lawsuits by Christians and Jews who have been attacked there

101 Aug 17, 2013
Reply by George Nickolas, USN (ret.)


"The supreme court won't help they are as bad as OBAMA IS he has them in his back poc…"

mark e. morris replied Apr 29, 2013 to Is the State Department blocking lawyers for the Benghazi Whistleblowers?

38 Apr 30, 2013


"Nancy under Obama our dealt has went to over $16 trillion it was only $10 trillion u…"

mark e. morris replied Apr 17, 2013 to General Told Congress Last Year That IED’s Common In Middle East May Be Coming To US

66 Apr 21, 2013
Reply by Rebecca M.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service