Jonathon Joseph Parker's Discussions (3,171)

Discussions Replied To (3163) Replies Latest Activity

"IT'S AMUSING, WE HAVE A MANUFACTORING COMPANY THAT LEFT MY HOME TOWN IN SPARTA,  TEN…"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 10, 2014 to Obama’s EEOC Heads to Mexico for Illegal Workers

51 Sep 20, 2014
Reply by Robert Oliver Luce

"TYPICAL OF THE "COMMUNIST" SENATE, IF YOU CAN'T GET YOUR WAY THEN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY…"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 10, 2014 to Congress is back and the Senate has the 1st Amendment in its sights!

39 Sep 11, 2014
Reply by H. Gregory Badger

ADMIN

"NOW HERE IS JUST A "THOUGHT" FOR ALL OF AMERICA ( NOT THE MOST CORRUPT MOST WORTHLES…"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 8, 2014 to U.S. Should Challenge Huge U.N. Funding Disparities

24 Sep 8, 2014
Reply by Fisherman Pat

ADMIN

"THE "MAU MAU" ARE NOW EVEN TURNING ON THEIR OWN !!!                                …"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 8, 2014 to High School Girl Taunted, Beaten At Bus Stop For Acting ‘Too Much Like A White Person’

58 Sep 14, 2014
Reply by Pete F

"MY BIG QUESTION IS:  WHY IS THIS MOSQUE STILL STANDING??   WHY HAVEN'T "ALL" OF IT'S…"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 8, 2014 to ISIS Beheading Videos Traced to Mosque in America, FBI Says.

46 Sep 9, 2014
Reply by Richard L Park

ADMIN

"HOWEVER YOU WILL NOTICE THAT OUR SOUTHERN BORDER IS STILL "WIDE OPEN!""

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 7, 2014 to MIKE LEE: OBAMA’S POST-ELECTION DELAY PROVES AMERICANS AGAINST EXECUTIVE AMNESTY

32 Sep 8, 2014
Reply by James Andrews

ADMIN

"EVERY ONE IN AMERICA NOW KNOWS THAT THE "STAND DOWN ORDER" WAS PERSONALLY GIVEN BY N…"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 6, 2014 to Benghazi Bombshell: There Was a Stand Down Order

47 Sep 7, 2014
Reply by Joanne Mortensen

ADMIN

"NOW LET US PUT THIS INTO AN UNDERSTANDABLE PERSPECTIVE:    FIRST THIS KENYAN BORN IL…"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 6, 2014 to Britain, France Demand ISIS Strategy from Obama

52 Sep 9, 2014
Reply by Michael Dennis Smith

ADMIN

"AND IF THE CONGRESS DOESN'T STOP HIM HE WILL DO JUST THAT!!!"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 6, 2014 to LA RAZA PRESIDENT 'DONE WAITING,' DEMANDS OBAMA GIVE EXEC AMNESTY TO 8 MILLION ILLEGALS

90 Sep 29, 2014
Reply by Charles Bill L.CDurry

"WHEN YOU HAVE A "MAFIA" GANGSTER ORGANIZATION DEFENDED BY FEDERAL "MAFIA" GANGSTER O…"

Jonathon Joseph Parker replied Sep 6, 2014 to Senator Levin to issue report dismissing the IRS of any wrong doing in Targeting Scandal

37 Sep 7, 2014
Reply by June Gagnon

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service