Carolyn Dorsey's Discussions (36)

Discussions Replied To (34) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"Hey Terrraaazzzzaaaaa Please pass the Ketchump"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Mar 27, 2014 to Label this Photo

50 Mar 28, 2014
Reply by Thomas Laman

"This is a great article. I started doing the same kind of thing getting ready to pos…"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Mar 21, 2014 to Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX 18) – KeyWiki Progressive/Marxist Profiles

38 Apr 6, 2014
Reply by robert cosenza

ADMIN

"They want dummies and they are gonna help even more by legalizing pot - what a great…"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Feb 14, 2014 to Chamber of Commerce President's Op Ed: We need Immigration Reform because Americans are Dumb

46 Feb 17, 2014
Reply by Pete F

ADMIN

"It's not enough for BIG BUSINESS as the LEFT calls it and the left and right EXPLOIT…"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Feb 10, 2014 to Companies recruiting undocumented immigrants who came to U.S. as children

38 Feb 15, 2014
Reply by storyTman

ADMIN

"If you think that's spooky, go check out supportthevoter.com and commoncause.org"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Jan 14, 2014 to Soros media group reaches deep into taxpayers' pockets

35 Jan 15, 2014
Reply by Fred Parsons

ADMIN

""Hey guys, did you see my new pair of kneepads? They come with a full year of FREE c…"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Jan 6, 2014 to Label this Photo!!

135 Jan 16, 2014
Reply by Michael Dennis Smith

ADMIN

"UC Berkley has banned the words Illegal Immigrant because it's just too darn offendi…"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Nov 10, 2013 to PUBLIC REVOLTS AGAINST OBAMA, POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT'S AMNESTY EFFORTS

101 Jul 7, 2014
Reply by Michael J. Erickson

ADMIN

"Well Gee Whiz. I thought there were only 11 MILLION illegal parasites here. 33 MILLI…"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Oct 21, 2013 to US Chamber of Commerce pleads for Obama’s help to pass immigration boost

25 Jan 1, 2014
Reply by davidfarrar

ADMIN

"Question. Let me see. My great-great-grandparents were American citizens. My great-g…"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Oct 19, 2013 to Justice Department Sues so Illegal Aliens can take American jobs

73 Oct 23, 2013
Reply by Mickeal Lee Carter

ADMIN

"I am just a married white mom, grandmom, tiny business owner, natural born citizen a…"

Carolyn Dorsey replied Oct 6, 2013 to Obama Goons force 77 year old out of private home on Federal Land

139 Oct 8, 2013
Reply by William Links

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service