Pete F's Discussions (1,877)

Discussions Replied To (1877) Replies Latest Activity


"Lets just hope her warranty expires on stage ."

Pete F replied Feb 24, 2017 to Nancy Pelosi is showing signs of mental breakdown

38 Feb 25, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic


"So the cartel puppets want to make our policy -I would suggest they get control of t…"

Pete F replied Feb 23, 2017 to Mexico fumes at 'hostile' Trump immigration rules as U.S. talks loom

36 Feb 27, 2017
Reply by Robert William Metcalf


"If there are any left in there they should be executed ."

Pete F replied Feb 22, 2017 to ISIS Suicide Bomber Identified As Former Guantanamo Detainee

23 Feb 22, 2017
Reply by John Barr


"F- Mexico "

Pete F replied Jan 30, 2017 to Jaw Dropping – Mexican Official Threatens to Unleash Cartels, Flood U.S. With Drugs and Narcotics….

62 Jan 31, 2017
Reply by gary r. hill

"Perhaps decent Americans will terminate the rioting trash "

Pete F replied Jan 16, 2017 to Riot Stand Down: Obama to Fire National Guard Chief During Inauguration

98 Jan 24, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)


"I will not be lectured by this racist piece of trash "

Pete F replied Jan 16, 2017 to DNC Chair Frontrunner: Trump Brings White Supremacy To The White House

73 Feb 7, 2017
Reply by Jea9

"obama is a filthy traitor that should be taken to gitmo "

Pete F replied Jan 15, 2017 to Riot Stand Down: Obama to Fire National Guard Chief During Inauguration

98 Jan 24, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"All members of cair should be shipped to gitmo . "


70 Jan 18, 2017
Reply by Philip D. Steenbergen


"He could pull an obama and nationalize the ground needed for the wall "

Pete F replied Jan 13, 2017 to Protests In Mexico Push Country To Brink Of Revolution And Nobody's Talking About It

105 Jan 19, 2017
Reply by Oren Long


"As long as we secure our border ---its their problem,let it stay there no"refugees""

Pete F replied Jan 12, 2017 to Protests In Mexico Push Country To Brink Of Revolution And Nobody's Talking About It

105 Jan 19, 2017
Reply by Oren Long




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service