Eliza's Discussions (280)

Discussions Replied To (280) Replies Latest Activity


"DONALD TRUMP is really starting to look better and better!! He IS NOT A POLISHED, PU…"

Eliza replied Jun 19, 2015 to Limbaugh Rips House GOP Over Trade: ‘A Sellout Of Republican Voters’

23 Jun 19, 2015
Reply by Brelan-Fayette :Knighten


"How about trans-progress, because TRULY, the new Progressive agenda, is actually EXT…"

Eliza replied Jun 19, 2015 to The Emperor is Still Naked

11 Jun 20, 2015
Reply by Howiem



Eliza replied Jun 11, 2015 to Pastors: We Don’t Have To Obey Supreme Court On Gay Marriage

51 Jun 14, 2015
Reply by Roberto Benitez



Eliza replied Jun 9, 2015 to So, This "Texas Pool Party" Story Seems to be Premised on, Get This, a Huge Lie

60 Jun 16, 2015
Reply by kathyet


"This totally strips bare the lie that Planned Parenthood, etc., are truly "pro-choic…"

Eliza replied Jun 5, 2015 to Why Liberals Oppose Over-the-Counter Birth Control

10 Jun 6, 2015
Reply by Freddie A. Hisle


"Outright Communism, and the sheep bleat in complaint!! Until parents with common sen…"

Eliza replied Jun 1, 2015 to WV teacher threatened with fine for violating Michelle O’s school snack rules

42 Jun 4, 2015
Reply by Gary M. Shaw

"Thank you for this article! It summarizes perfectly what I've observed happening the…"

Eliza replied May 31, 2015 to "Why Waste The Effort, If Nothing is Going To Change?"

18 Jun 1, 2015
Reply by Oren Long

"In May, 2009, this demonic cabal in Congress, ALREADY PASSED, H.R.909, that IS a hat…"

Eliza replied May 31, 2015 to THE LEFT’S ‘CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER': Christianity!?

17 Jun 2, 2015
Reply by ABU TOM

"Too true! I look around, and the average person has NO IDEA about much of anything!!…"

Eliza replied May 29, 2015 to Moral Decay ... and Public Officials

17 Jun 1, 2015
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)


"Unfortunate, but true!  I think there are only about 10 true conservatives in Congre…"

Eliza replied May 29, 2015 to House GOP demands criminal investigation into Lois Lerner

21 Jun 2, 2015
Reply by Karen Miner




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service