John C. Stewart's Discussions (396)

Discussions Replied To (394) Replies Latest Activity


"Too many conspiracies in DC, EVIL and ULTRA EVIL."

John C. Stewart replied Jan 19, 2014 to 1.1 Trillion Reasons to Dump Boehner and McConnell

31 Jan 23, 2014
Reply by Robert J Metcalf


"Sounds like a few are getting the message."

John C. Stewart replied Jan 18, 2014 to The GOP Establishment Ain’t What it Used to Be

28 Jan 20, 2014
Reply by AHP1081

"John Kerry was and will always be a two faced inept liar. That should make his lying…"

John C. Stewart replied Jan 17, 2014 to Israel accuses U.S. of generating artificial crisis

39 Jan 27, 2014
Reply by robert cosenza

"Looking into the face of treachery. Those beady eyes speak volumes of contempt, it i…"

John C. Stewart replied Jan 17, 2014 to Why Did the Benghazi Story Change?

31 Jan 22, 2014
Reply by A_Nobody

"Liars lying about the liars that lied  at the start of this ludicrous lie. I do beli…"

John C. Stewart replied Jan 17, 2014 to Obamacare Official: Website Still Being Built, Needs More Money

18 Jan 18, 2014
Reply by Thomas L. Stafford

"This isn't the DOJ for two reasons, #1 and the most important Holder and justice are…"

John C. Stewart replied Jan 17, 2014 to DOJ rules feds can no longer profile Muslims on basis of religion

124 Jan 19, 2014
Reply by Lori Denham


"A good start, with a lot more to go."

John C. Stewart replied Jan 16, 2014 to House Armed Services Chair McKeon acknowledges tea party tactics influenced retirement decision

29 Feb 15, 2014
Reply by AHP1081

"Another legend in his own mind(?)"

John C. Stewart replied Jan 16, 2014 to Paul Ryan Justifies Cutting Veteran Pensions: “We Just Freed Up $6 Billion For Readiness

119 Jan 22, 2014
Reply by Rick Hankins


"Free speech is now a hate crime, if you disect a lefty. Righty's are fair game. Next…"

John C. Stewart replied Jan 16, 2014 to 13 House Democrats offer bill demanding government study on Internet hate speech

53 Jan 17, 2014
Reply by H. Gregory Badger


"Plus the state of the deceased and nonexistant."

John C. Stewart replied Jan 15, 2014 to Judicial Watch, True the Vote Reach Historic Settlement with State of Ohio in Lawsuit over Clean Voter Rolls

51 Jan 16, 2014
Reply by Randal W. Howard




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service