mike kesterson's Discussions (105)

Discussions Replied To (105) Replies Latest Activity

"I am proud that these AMERICANS see through the lies the democratic party push to tu…"


23 Aug 14, 2016
Reply by Debra A Shawver


"DO WHAT!!!!"

mike kesterson replied Jul 25, 2016 to Obama: Honesty Is ‘Absolutely Necessary’ Trait for a President

51 Jul 27, 2016
Reply by H. Gregory Badger


"This muslim idiot does not speak for "AMERICAN PEOPLE" he is only in the White house…"

mike kesterson replied Apr 24, 2016 to London mayor describes Obama as 'part-Kenyan'

35 May 4, 2016
Reply by Archie C B


"God bless him for having a back bone that many others DO NOT have anymore that are a…"

mike kesterson replied Feb 8, 2016 to Wis. mayor defiant after calling Obama ‘Muslim’

98 Feb 9, 2016
Reply by James Lakes, CPIAA, EGA


"I can't wait till the she-man is gone and her queer husband too."

mike kesterson replied Jan 20, 2016 to Michelle Obama On Life At The White House: “I hate this place.”

80 Jan 27, 2016
Reply by William Bolton

"If I anything to do with it the uncivilized barbarians would not even be allowed in…"

mike kesterson replied Jan 9, 2016 to Should Muslims Own Guns?

202 Jan 18, 2016
Reply by ivan scheu


"considering he is a queer I would not want old limp wrist working out with me."

mike kesterson replied Jan 3, 2016 to Obama: I 'Feel Small' Next to US Marines

58 Jan 3, 2016
Reply by mike kesterson


"If he had sent it to a boy I bet the faggots would not have had a problem with it, t…"

mike kesterson replied Nov 13, 2015 to 9 Year-Old-Boy Threatened With Sexual Harassment Charges For Passing Love Notes To School Girl Crush

22 Nov 13, 2015
Reply by Karma Miller


"This worthless bastard would never do us a favor by starving himself to death less g…"

mike kesterson replied Nov 12, 2015 to Mizzou hunger striker protesting 'white privilege' has a father making $6 million last year

24 Nov 18, 2015
Reply by Jo Gonzalez


"This BS is not gonna stop till you pay the bastards for getting out of bed in the mo…"

mike kesterson replied Nov 12, 2015 to Mizzou hunger striker protesting 'white privilege' has a father making $6 million last year

24 Nov 18, 2015
Reply by Jo Gonzalez




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service