Corruption (3,442)

Discussions Replies Latest Activity

Our 2nd Amendment... now a hollow vision of our founding father's intent.

The Second Amendment was meant to provide the people with the arms to defend against tyranny... against rouge governments.  Today, the peo…

Started by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

103 Sep 6
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

Federal Reserve Banking Economy News: Going Broke To Build The New World Order

 Part 1- The British Federal Reserve Banking, draining off all the valuables of nations, while pushing a cashless banking, to hide their co…

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan

32 Sep 5
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

DOJ Lets James Comey off the Hook After Leaking Classified Info

 The Department of Justice has let fired FBI Director James Comey off the hook, despite evidence showing he leaked several memos containing…

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan

1 Aug 30
Reply by Amanda L. Rose

Federal Judge Who Oversaw Release Of Jeffrey Epstein’s Sealed Records Was Found Dead

Note:  Another notch on the Clinton metaphorical butt of the gun? Or maybe not so metaphorical!  <><><><><>…

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan

1 Aug 17
Reply by Rosie Daniels

Bill Gates Flew on Lolita Express With Jeffrey Epstein After Child Sex Conviction

 Newly released flight logs reveal that Bill Gates flew with Jeffrey Epstein on the “Lolita Express” just four years after Epstein was conv…

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan

2 Aug 14
Reply by Kristi Ann Mod

When The Russian People Speak Out Against Their Government: Vladimir Bukovsky

 A interesting video, not over the top, but in Russia, most of the time they kill you for freedom of speech against a corrupt government.…

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan

2 Aug 11
Reply by Hank Jordan

ANONYMOUS at DarkDox: PizzaGate Part 1

 Download this video as well as thousands of others, audio files, PDFs, and more FREE, ANONYMOUS at DarkDox.com. This is information warfar…

Started by Henry Massingale

2 Aug 9
Reply by Hank Jordan

WoW! Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Kamala Harris Of Holding Slaves In Prison For California During 2nd 2019 Democrat Debate

I couldn't believe it! "Tulsi Gabbard" the democrat presidential candidate who's forced to keep quiet by her handlers blasted the favorite…

Started by James Allan

1 Aug 1
Reply by Kristi Ann Mod

THE ASSAULT ON THE CONSTITUTION

THE ASSAULT ON THE CONSTITUTION THE STORY OF A ROGUE GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST DONALD TRUMP AND WE THE PEOPLE I am currently watching a…

Started by Bob Russell

5 Jul 31
Reply by Bob Russell

Criminal Acts Under The CURRENT Federal Immigration and Nationality Act.. Why aren't they being prosecuted?

Federal Immigration and Nationality Act Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) "Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien t…

Started by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

261 Jul 30
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service