Poll: Should Obama be Impeached?

Event Details

Poll:  Should Obama be Impeached?

Time: January 7, 2014 at 11am to January 7, 2015 at 11pm
Location: Everywhere!
Event Type: poll
Organized By: Dee
Latest Activity: Dec 15, 2014

Export to Outlook or iCal (.ics)

Event Description

Please vote and then Share on FaceBook and Twitter! Free and Easy Protest! As we get the poll tallies we will send them to all 435 Members of the House of Representatives and all 100 Members of the Senate, 535 in all, and we will eat the cost so you can build your Warrior courage for 2014

http://tinyurl.com/puvxknj

Comment Wall

Comment

RSVP for Poll: Should Obama be Impeached? to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Virgil Earl Koon on September 14, 2014 at 9:30pm

As usual site messed up. All of us have voted to impeach and since it has been asked for a year or more Obama has committed several more acts of treason. I am sure he could be changed with them and to heck with the treason supporting Marxist Liberal media!

Comment by Virgil Earl Koon on September 14, 2014 at 9:27pm

Comment by Dave Massey on April 30, 2014 at 4:10am

I have voted many times online to have him impeached at rhe very least. I am thinking now that to merely impeach him would be another slap in the face of all True Americans. It so far seems tho that he is untouchable and knows it. If it is at all possible to impeach him it surely should be done. I have stated before no one else in the history of this Country would have gotten away with a "smidgen" of the crimes he commits  seemingly on a  daily basis. He still has over a year and a half to commit these atrocities against Our Country.  Lets do everything we can to send him on his way ASAP. YOU GET MY VOTE!!!!!!!!!

Comment by ronald gilmer on April 17, 2014 at 9:56pm

Tried for High Treason!  The Senate needs to stay out of this!  Am I correct is saying the Chief Justice would preside over the trial?

Comment by AvmcVick on April 16, 2014 at 7:59pm
Yes!!
Comment by Ancient Warrior on April 12, 2014 at 7:46pm

Does that include tarring and feathering?

Comment by albert shea on April 7, 2014 at 8:54pm

 how can I find an event close to where I live in boston

Comment by June Larsen on March 8, 2014 at 1:02pm

When and if the "Sealed" records of Barry Soetoro aka Barrack H Obama are ever UNsealed --  He will not only be impeached , but perhaps shot as a Terrorist!! 

What person who has "Nothing TO Hide" SEALS  their past private and public records from public view???  [Only criminals that I know of!!]

The American people have been duped into electing a Marxist [Communist]/Muslim president whose past life has been sealed off by the Saul Alinsky Democratic Marxist/Muslim Party!!

A man who has stated that "America is no longer a Christian Nation", and he and his Communist/Muslim/Pagan advisors are making sure that it stays that way!!!

Comment by Charles Palmer on March 8, 2014 at 7:01am

I am convinced that Obama is knowingly and willingly destroying this country. Not only impeached but jailed!!

Comment by Kirby Nebeker on February 12, 2014 at 10:14pm

I will not support this so called dictator who is blatently defying the laws of the land and putting all of America at great risk. I won't stand for increasing debt limits and stripping the working class of hard earned money while he wines and dines with his wife while there are millions in need of the basics of life. He needs to Go and Soon!! I also don't want Biden in office. He couldn't tell his fourth point of contact from his nose. 

Attending (34)

Might attend (8)

Not Attending (17)

LIGHTER SIDE

The cartoonist's homepage, indystar.com/opinion/varvel

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service